Scaling drivers that implement internal governors do not have governor
structures assocaited with them. Only track the name of the governor
associated with the CPU if the driver does not implement
cpufreq_driver.setpolicy()
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Scaling drivers that implement cpufreq_driver.setpolicy() have
internal governors that do not signal changes via
cpufreq_notify_transition() so the frequncy in the policy will almost
certainly be different than the current frequncy. Only call
cpufreq_out_of_sync() when the underlying driver implements
cpufreq_driver.target()
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Scaling drivers that implement the cpufreq_driver.setpolicy() versus
the cpufreq_driver.target() interface do not set policy->cur.
Normally policy->cur is set during the call to cpufreq_driver.target()
when the frequnecy request is made by the governor.
If the scaling driver implements cpufreq_driver.setpolicy() and
cpufreq_driver.get() interfaces use cpufreq_driver.get() to retrieve
the current frequency.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq core uses two locks:
- cpufreq_driver_lock: General lock for driver and cpufreq_cpu_data array.
- cpu_policy_rwsemfix locking: per CPU reader-writer semaphore designed to cure
all cpufreq/hotplug/workqueue/etc related lock issues.
These locks were not used properly and are placed against their principle
(present before their definition) at various places. This patch is an attempt to
fix their use.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
On the lines of macro: lock_policy_rwsem, we can create another macro for
unlock_policy_rwsem. Lets do it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Because the sibling cpu of any online cpu is identified very early in
cpufreq_add_dev(), below code is never executed. And so can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
On multi-policy systems there is a single instance of governor for both the
policies (if same governor is chosen for both policies). With the code update
from following patches:
8eeed09 cpufreq: governors: Get rid of dbs_data->enable field
b394058 cpufreq: governors: Reset tunables only for cpufreq_unregister_governor()
We are creating/removing sysfs directory of governor for for every call to
GOV_START and STOP. This would fail for multi-policy system as there is a
per-policy call to START/STOP.
This patch reuses the governor->initialized variable to detect total users of
governor.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In order to avoid the calculation of up_threshold - down_differential
every time that the frequency must be decreased, we replace the
down_differential tuner with the adj_up_threshold which keeps the
difference across multiple checks.
Update the adj_up_threshold only when the up_theshold is also updated.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Macro "CPUFREQ_STATDEVICE_ATTR" is defined local to cpufreq_stats.c file and is
almost a copy of the generic version present in cpufreq.h file. Lets use the
generic version instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
policy->cpu or cpus in policy->cpus can't be offline anymore. And so we don't
need to check if they are online or not.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add an imx6q-cpufreq driver for Freescale i.MX6Q SoC to handle the
hardware specific frequency and voltage scaling requirements.
The driver supports module build and is instantiated by the platform
device/driver mechanism, so that it will not be instantiated on other
platforms, as IMX is built with multiplatform support.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
"cpufreq" directory in policy->cpu is never created using
sysfs_create_link(), but using kobject_init_and_add(). And so we
shouldn't call sysfs_remove_link() for policy->cpu(). sysfs stuff
for policy->cpu is automatically removed when we call kobject_put()
for dying policy.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
policy->shared_type field was added only for SoCs with ACPI support:
commit 3b2d99429e
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Wed Dec 14 15:05:00 2005 -0500
P-state software coordination for ACPI core
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5737
Many non-ACPI systems are filling this field by mistake, which makes its usage
confusing. Lets clean it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the core.
commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000
cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
Lets fix it for all single cluster SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For multicore SoC's, with cores sharing clock line, we are required to set
policy->cpus and policy->related_cpus with mask of cpus.
With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the cpufreq core.
commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000
cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
Current Tegra driver fills only ->related_cpus and not ->cpus, which looks to be
incorrect. Lets fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, whenever governor->governor() is called for CPUFRREQ_GOV_START event
we reset few tunables of governor. Which isn't correct, as this routine is
called for every cpu hot-[un]plugging event. We should actually be resetting
these only when the governor module is removed and re-installed.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With the inclusion of following patches:
9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
code redundancy between the conservative and ondemand governors is
introduced again, so get rid of it.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CPUFREQ_GOV_START/STOP are called only once for all policy->cpus and hence we
don't need to adapt cpufreq_governor_dbs() routine for multiple calls.
So, this patch removes dbs_data->enable field entirely. And rearrange code a
bit.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fix governors code to set all cpu's cdbs->cpu to the the actual cpu id
and use cur_policy->cpu istead of cdbs->cpu to track current governor's
leader cpu.
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Implement a generic helper function policy_is_shared() to replace the
current dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus() at cpufreq level, so that it can be
used by code other than cpufreq governors.
Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
SPEAr cpufreq driver supports dual core Cortex-A9 SoC's, where cpus share policy
structure. Whenever we update frequency of a cpu, we must notify all
policy->cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Documentation related to cpus and related_cpus is confusing and not very clear.
Over that CPUFreq core has seen much changes recently. Lets update documentation
and comments for cpus and related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As multiplatform build is being adopted by more and more ARM platforms,
initcall function should be used very carefully. For example, when
GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 is built in the kernel, cpu0_cpufreq_driver_init()
will be called on all the platforms to initialize cpufreq-cpu0 driver.
To eliminate this undesired the effect, the patch changes cpufreq-cpu0
driver to have it instantiated as a platform_driver. Then it will only
run on platforms that create the platform_device "cpufreq-cpu0".
Along with the change, it also changes cpu_dev to be &pdev->dev,
so that managed functions can start working, and module build gets
supported too.
The highbank-cpufreq driver is also updated accordingly to adapt the
changes on cpufreq-cpu0.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop unused arguments from dbs_timer_init and clean dbs_timer_exit and
cpufreq_governor_dbs to remove non necessary special cases.
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently cpufreq_add_dev() firsts allocates policy, calls
driver->init() and then checks if this CPU is already managed or not.
And if it is already managed, its policy is freed.
We can save all this if we somehow know that CPU is managed or not in
advance. policy->related_cpus contains the list of all valid sibling
CPUs of policy->cpu. We can check this to see if the current CPU is
already managed.
From now on, platforms don't really need to set related_cpus from
their init() routines, as the same work is done by core too.
If a platform driver needs to set the related_cpus mask with some
additional CPUs, other than CPUs present in policy->cpus, they are
free to do it, though, as we don't override anything.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This reverts commit 956f339 "cpufreq: Don't use cpu removed during
cpufreq_driver_unregister".
With the addition of the following commit, this change/variable is not
required any more:
commit b9ba2725343ae57add3f324dfa5074167f48de96
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Mon Jan 14 13:23:03 2013 +0000
cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()
[rjw: Subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Export cpufreq helpers in OPP to make the cpufreq-core0 and highbank-cpufreq
drivers loadable as modules.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We are GPLV2 library, so be clear in the symbols exported as well.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Highbank processors depend on the external ECME to perform voltage
management based on a requested frequency. Communication between the
A9 cores and the ECME happens over the pl320 IPC channel.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The pl320 IPC allows for interprocessor communication between the
highbank A9 and the EnergyCore Management Engine. The pl320 implements
a straightforward mailbox protocol.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The highbank clock will glitch with the current code if the
clock rate is reset without relocking the PLL. Program the PLL
correctly to prevent glitches.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Move clk setup to twd_local_timer_common_register and rely on
twd_timer_rate being 0 to force calibration if there is no clock.
Remove common_setup_called as it is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Move function prototypes to a place where they logically fit better.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Check whether we've actually already loaded acpi-cpufreq before
requesting it.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add a helper function to return cpufreq_driver->name.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that the majority of x86 CPUs out there are supported by
acpi-cpufreq, we want it to load first and, in the AMD case, drop to
powernow-k8 only on K8s. If, however, both powernow-k8 and acpi-cpufreq
are built-in, the link order matters. Correct that.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
de3ed81d74 ("[CPUFREQ] Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules")
changed cpufreq drivers link order so that powernow-k8 gets loaded first
due to earlier K8s having BIOS bugs.
However, now that acpi-cpufreq supports both AMD and Intel CPUs with HW
P-states, we want to load it first, so that cases where acpi-cpufreq and
powernow-k8 are both built-in and powernow-k8 initializing first, can be
addressed.
So, make sure that even if acpi-cpufreq gets loaded first, it errors out
on K8s and powernow-k8 can be loaded then successfully.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
References: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130118162347.GA31499@srcf.ucam.org
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When disable_cpufreq() is called some exported functions are still
being used that do not have a check for cpufreq being disabled.
Add a disabled check into cpufreq_cpu_get() to return NULL if
cpufreq is disabled this covers most of the exported functions. For
the exported functions that do not call cpufreq_cpu_get() add an
explicit check.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
__cpufreq_remove_dev() is called on multiple occasions: cpufreq_driver
unregister and cpu removals.
Current implementation of this routine is overly complex without much need. If
the cpu to be removed is the policy->cpu, we remove the policy first and add all
other cpus again from policy->cpus and then finally call __cpufreq_remove_dev()
again to remove the cpu to be deleted. Haahhhh..
There exist a simple solution to removal of a cpu:
- Simply use the old policy structure
- update its fields like: policy->cpu, etc.
- notify any users of cpufreq, which depend on changing policy->cpu
Hence this patch, which tries to implement the above theory. It is tested well
by myself on ARM big.LITTLE TC2 SoC, which has 5 cores (2 A15 and 3 A7). Both
A15's share same struct policy and all A7's share same policy structure.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch fixes following sparse warning:
drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c:33:5: warning: symbol 'spear_cpufreq_verify' was
not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is how the core works:
cpufreq_driver_unregister()
- subsys_interface_unregister()
- for_each_cpu() call cpufreq_remove_dev(), i.e. 0,1,2,3,4 when we
unregister.
cpufreq_remove_dev():
- Remove policy node
- Call cpufreq_add_dev() for next cpu, sharing mask with removed cpu.
i.e. When cpu 0 is removed, we call it for cpu 1. And when called for cpu 2,
we call it for cpu 3.
- cpufreq_add_dev() would call cpufreq_driver->init()
- init would return mask as AND of 2, 3 and 4 for cluster A7.
- cpufreq core would do online_cpu && policy->cpus
Here is the BUG(). Because cpu hasn't died but we have just unregistered
the cpufreq driver, online cpu would still have cpu 2 in it. And so thing
go bad again.
Solution: Keep cpumask of cpus that are registered with cpufreq core and clear
cpus when we get a call from subsys_interface_unregister() via
cpufreq_remove_dev().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Because cpufreq core and governors worry only about the online cpus, if a cpu is
hot [un]plugged, we must notify governors about it, otherwise be ready to expect
something unexpected.
We already have notifiers in the form of CPUFREQ_GOV_START/CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP, we
just need to call them now.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned
mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq core
or governors.
We need to get only online cpus in this mask. There are two places to fix this
mask, cpufreq core and cpufreq driver. It makes sense to do this at common place
and hence is done in core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify update_sampling_rate() to check, and eventually immediately
schedule, all CPU's do_dbs_timer delayed work.
This is required in case of software coordinated CPUs, as we now have a
separate delayed work for each CPU.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify conservative timer to not resample CPU utilization if recently
sampled from another SW coordinated core.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify ondemand timer to not resample CPU utilization if recently
sampled from another SW coordinated core.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU
and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned
and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a
secondary CPU had a change in load this was not detected by the cpufreq
governor (both ondemand and conservative).
This patch make sure that deferred timers are run on all CPUs in the
case of software controlled CPUs that run on the same frequency.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
support.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=qtaF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'dm-3.8-fixes-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agk/linux-dm
Pull more device-mapper fixes from Alasdair G Kergon:
"A fix for stacked dm thin devices and a fix for the new dm WRITE SAME
support."
* tag 'dm-3.8-fixes-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agk/linux-dm:
dm: fix write same requests counting
dm thin: fix queue limits stacking
Dirk Brandewie