It's already called if TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set, so we only
need to add the actual work. Note that checking for RESTORE_SIGMASK
was not needed - set_restore_sigmask() also sets SIGPENDING, so
we never RESTORE_SIGMASK without SIGPENDING.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME added (as bit 5). That way nommu glue needs no changes at
all; mmu one needs just to replace jmi do_signal_return to jne do_signal_return
There we have flags shifted up, until bit 6 (SIGPENDING) is in MSBit; instead
of checking that MSBit is set (jmi) we check that MSBit or something below it
is set (jne); bits 0..4 are never set, so that's precisely "bit 6 or bit 5 is
set".
Usual handling of NOTIFY_RESUME/SIGPENDING is done in do_notify_resume(); glue
calls it instead of do_signal().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
* move force_sigsegv() (from setup...frame()) and clearing RESTART_SIGMASK
(from do_signal()) into hanlde_signal()
* get rid of handle_signal() return value and oldset argument
* checking for TIF_SIGPENDING is enough; set_restart_sigmask() sets this
one as well.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
It's been a dead code since commit 571202f50f
Author: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Date: Fri Dec 11 12:54:04 2009 +0100
microblaze: Remove rt_sigsuspend wrapper
Generic rt_sigsuspend syscalls doesn't need any asm wrapper.
but that commit has only removed it from entry.S, missing one in entry-nommu.S.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and resetting sa_handler in local copy filled by get_signal_to_deliver()
is obviously pointless anyway.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Complete the move of sh64 to it, trim the crap from prototypes,
tidy up a bit. Infrastructure in do_signal() had already been
there, in signal_64 as well as in signal_32 (where it was already
used).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
arch/hexagon/kernel/signal.c:do_notify_resume() forgets to call
tracehook_notify_resume() if TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2 ("signal:
add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which
centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully
delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures.
In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper
function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
It is wrong to change ->blocked directly, see e6fa16ab. Change
handle_signal() and sys_rt_sigreturn() to use the right helper,
set_current_blocked().
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The current handle_signal() implementation is broken - it will mask
signals if we fail to setup the signal stack frame, which isn't the
desired behaviour, we should only be masking signals if we succeed in
setting up the stack frame. It looks like this code was copied from the
old (broken) arm implementation but wasn't updated when the arm code was
fixed in commit a6c61e9dfd ("[ARM] 3168/1: Update ARM signal delivery
and masking").
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
There are a couple of problems with the current signal code,
1. If we failed to setup the signal stack frame then we should not be
masking any signals.
2. ka->sa.sa_mask is only added to the current blocked signals list if
SA_NODEFER is set in ka->sa.sa_flags. If we successfully setup the
signal frame and are going to run the handler then we must honour
sa_mask.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if SA_ONESHOT is
set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again in handle_signal().
Furthermore, because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which is a copy
of sighand->action[]) instead of sighand->action[] the original code
actually had no effect on signal delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call it.
This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler (which
is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the code was to
modify sighand->action[] directly.
As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on signal
delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
If setup_rt_frame() returns -EFAULT then we must not block any signals
in the current process.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.
Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
