linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck
Zachary Amsden 18420001d6 [PATCH] i386: Clean up arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c
No, just no.  You do not use goto to skip a code block.  You do not
return an obvious variable from a singly-inlined function and give
the function a return value.  You don't put unexplained comments
about kmalloc in code which doesn't do dynamic allocation.  And
you don't leave stray warnings around for no good reason.

Also, when possible, it is better to use block scoped variables
because gcc can sometime generate better code.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2007-05-02 19:27:16 +02:00
..
k7.c [PATCH] i386: Enable bank 0 on non K7 Athlon 2007-05-02 19:27:12 +02:00
Makefile [PATCH] x86: Refactor thermal throttle processing 2006-09-26 10:52:42 +02:00
mce.c [PATCH] i386: arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c should #include <asm/mce.h> 2007-02-13 13:26:22 +01:00
mce.h [PATCH] i386: Move mce_disabled to asm/mce.h 2007-02-13 13:26:26 +01:00
non-fatal.c WorkStruct: make allyesconfig 2006-11-22 14:57:56 +00:00
p4.c [PATCH] i386: Clean up arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c 2007-05-02 19:27:16 +02:00
p5.c [PATCH] x86: add MCE resume 2005-11-07 07:53:30 -08:00
p6.c [PATCH] x86: add MCE resume 2005-11-07 07:53:30 -08:00
therm_throt.c [PATCH] hotplug CPU: clean up hotcpu_notifier() use 2006-12-07 08:39:39 -08:00
winchip.c [PATCH] x86: add MCE resume 2005-11-07 07:53:30 -08:00