47e9037ac1
If a device doesn't support power management (pm_cap == 0) but it is
acpi_pci_power_manageable() because there is a _PS0 method declared for
it and _EJ0 is also declared for the slot then nobody is going to set
current_state = PCI_D0 for this device. This is what I think it is
happening:
pci_enable_device
|
__pci_enable_device_flags
/* here we do not set current_state because !pm_cap */
|
do_pci_enable_device
|
pci_set_power_state
|
__pci_start_power_transition
|
pci_platform_power_transition
/* platform_pci_power_manageable() calls acpi_pci_power_manageable that
* returns true */
|
platform_pci_set_power_state
/* acpi_pci_set_power_state gets called and does nothing because the
* acpi device has _EJ0, see the comment "If the ACPI device has _EJ0,
* ignore the device" */
at this point if we refer to the commit message that introduced the
comment above (
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi_pcihp.c | ||
acpiphp.h | ||
acpiphp_core.c | ||
acpiphp_glue.c | ||
acpiphp_ibm.c | ||
cpci_hotplug.h | ||
cpci_hotplug_core.c | ||
cpci_hotplug_pci.c | ||
cpcihp_generic.c | ||
cpcihp_zt5550.c | ||
cpcihp_zt5550.h | ||
cpqphp.h | ||
cpqphp_core.c | ||
cpqphp_ctrl.c | ||
cpqphp_nvram.c | ||
cpqphp_nvram.h | ||
cpqphp_pci.c | ||
cpqphp_sysfs.c | ||
fakephp.c | ||
ibmphp.h | ||
ibmphp_core.c | ||
ibmphp_ebda.c | ||
ibmphp_hpc.c | ||
ibmphp_pci.c | ||
ibmphp_res.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile | ||
pci_hotplug_core.c | ||
pciehp.h | ||
pciehp_acpi.c | ||
pciehp_core.c | ||
pciehp_ctrl.c | ||
pciehp_hpc.c | ||
pciehp_pci.c | ||
pcihp_skeleton.c | ||
pcihp_slot.c | ||
rpadlpar.h | ||
rpadlpar_core.c | ||
rpadlpar_sysfs.c | ||
rpaphp.h | ||
rpaphp_core.c | ||
rpaphp_pci.c | ||
rpaphp_slot.c | ||
sgi_hotplug.c | ||
shpchp.h | ||
shpchp_core.c | ||
shpchp_ctrl.c | ||
shpchp_hpc.c | ||
shpchp_pci.c | ||
shpchp_sysfs.c |