linux/kernel/power/suspend_test.c
Rafael J. Wysocki 04bf7539c0 PM: Make warning in suspend_test_finish() less likely to happen
Increase TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS to 10 so the warning in
suspend_test_finish() doesn't annoy the users of slower systems so much.

Also, make the warning print the suspend-resume cycle time, so that we
know why the warning actually triggered.

Patch prepared during the hacking session at the Kernel Summit in Tokyo.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-10-22 08:23:45 +09:00

188 lines
5 KiB
C

/*
* kernel/power/suspend_test.c - Suspend to RAM and standby test facility.
*
* Copyright (c) 2009 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
*
* This file is released under the GPLv2.
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/rtc.h>
#include "power.h"
/*
* We test the system suspend code by setting an RTC wakealarm a short
* time in the future, then suspending. Suspending the devices won't
* normally take long ... some systems only need a few milliseconds.
*
* The time it takes is system-specific though, so when we test this
* during system bootup we allow a LOT of time.
*/
#define TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS 10
static unsigned long suspend_test_start_time;
void suspend_test_start(void)
{
/* FIXME Use better timebase than "jiffies", ideally a clocksource.
* What we want is a hardware counter that will work correctly even
* during the irqs-are-off stages of the suspend/resume cycle...
*/
suspend_test_start_time = jiffies;
}
void suspend_test_finish(const char *label)
{
long nj = jiffies - suspend_test_start_time;
unsigned msec;
msec = jiffies_to_msecs(abs(nj));
pr_info("PM: %s took %d.%03d seconds\n", label,
msec / 1000, msec % 1000);
/* Warning on suspend means the RTC alarm period needs to be
* larger -- the system was sooo slooowwww to suspend that the
* alarm (should have) fired before the system went to sleep!
*
* Warning on either suspend or resume also means the system
* has some performance issues. The stack dump of a WARN_ON
* is more likely to get the right attention than a printk...
*/
WARN(msec > (TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS * 1000),
"Component: %s, time: %u\n", label, msec);
}
/*
* To test system suspend, we need a hands-off mechanism to resume the
* system. RTCs wake alarms are a common self-contained mechanism.
*/
static void __init test_wakealarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, suspend_state_t state)
{
static char err_readtime[] __initdata =
KERN_ERR "PM: can't read %s time, err %d\n";
static char err_wakealarm [] __initdata =
KERN_ERR "PM: can't set %s wakealarm, err %d\n";
static char err_suspend[] __initdata =
KERN_ERR "PM: suspend test failed, error %d\n";
static char info_test[] __initdata =
KERN_INFO "PM: test RTC wakeup from '%s' suspend\n";
unsigned long now;
struct rtc_wkalrm alm;
int status;
/* this may fail if the RTC hasn't been initialized */
status = rtc_read_time(rtc, &alm.time);
if (status < 0) {
printk(err_readtime, dev_name(&rtc->dev), status);
return;
}
rtc_tm_to_time(&alm.time, &now);
memset(&alm, 0, sizeof alm);
rtc_time_to_tm(now + TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS, &alm.time);
alm.enabled = true;
status = rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alm);
if (status < 0) {
printk(err_wakealarm, dev_name(&rtc->dev), status);
return;
}
if (state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM) {
printk(info_test, pm_states[state]);
status = pm_suspend(state);
if (status == -ENODEV)
state = PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY;
}
if (state == PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY) {
printk(info_test, pm_states[state]);
status = pm_suspend(state);
}
if (status < 0)
printk(err_suspend, status);
/* Some platforms can't detect that the alarm triggered the
* wakeup, or (accordingly) disable it after it afterwards.
* It's supposed to give oneshot behavior; cope.
*/
alm.enabled = false;
rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alm);
}
static int __init has_wakealarm(struct device *dev, void *name_ptr)
{
struct rtc_device *candidate = to_rtc_device(dev);
if (!candidate->ops->set_alarm)
return 0;
if (!device_may_wakeup(candidate->dev.parent))
return 0;
*(const char **)name_ptr = dev_name(dev);
return 1;
}
/*
* Kernel options like "test_suspend=mem" force suspend/resume sanity tests
* at startup time. They're normally disabled, for faster boot and because
* we can't know which states really work on this particular system.
*/
static suspend_state_t test_state __initdata = PM_SUSPEND_ON;
static char warn_bad_state[] __initdata =
KERN_WARNING "PM: can't test '%s' suspend state\n";
static int __init setup_test_suspend(char *value)
{
unsigned i;
/* "=mem" ==> "mem" */
value++;
for (i = 0; i < PM_SUSPEND_MAX; i++) {
if (!pm_states[i])
continue;
if (strcmp(pm_states[i], value) != 0)
continue;
test_state = (__force suspend_state_t) i;
return 0;
}
printk(warn_bad_state, value);
return 0;
}
__setup("test_suspend", setup_test_suspend);
static int __init test_suspend(void)
{
static char warn_no_rtc[] __initdata =
KERN_WARNING "PM: no wakealarm-capable RTC driver is ready\n";
char *pony = NULL;
struct rtc_device *rtc = NULL;
/* PM is initialized by now; is that state testable? */
if (test_state == PM_SUSPEND_ON)
goto done;
if (!valid_state(test_state)) {
printk(warn_bad_state, pm_states[test_state]);
goto done;
}
/* RTCs have initialized by now too ... can we use one? */
class_find_device(rtc_class, NULL, &pony, has_wakealarm);
if (pony)
rtc = rtc_class_open(pony);
if (!rtc) {
printk(warn_no_rtc);
goto done;
}
/* go for it */
test_wakealarm(rtc, test_state);
rtc_class_close(rtc);
done:
return 0;
}
late_initcall(test_suspend);