This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r1@
statement S;
position p,p1;
@@
S@p1;@p
@script:python r2@
p << r1.p;
p1 << r1.p1;
@@
if p[0].line != p1[0].line_end:
cocci.include_match(False)
@@
position r1.p;
@@
-;@p
// </smpl>
[mchehab@redhat.com: some hunks got bitroted; applied only the
ones that succeeds]
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
[crope@iki.fi: For my drivers a8293, af9013, af9015, af9035]
Acked-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Various subdevs cleared the full v4l2_sliced_vbi_format struct, when
only the service_set/lines fields should have been cleared.
Due to this the io_size field was wrongly cleared to 0, causing a
v4l2-compliance error.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Ezequiel Garcia