We have a pretty decent confusion about vertical timings of interlaced
modes. Peter Ross has written a patch that makes interlace modes work
on a lot more platforms/output combinations by doubling the vertical
timings.
The issue with that patch is that core drm _does_ support specifying
whether we want these vertical timings in fields or frames, we just
haven't managed to consistently use this facility. The relavant
function is drm_mode_set_crtcinfo, which fills in the crtc timing
information.
The first thing to note is that the drm core keeps interlaced modes in
frames, but displays modelines in fields. So when the crtc modeset
helper copies over the mode into adjusted_mode it will already contain
vertical timings in half-frames. The result is that the fixup code in
intel_crtc_mode_fixup doesn't actually do anything (in most cases at
least).
Now gen3+ natively supports interlaced modes and wants the vertical
timings in frames. Which is what sdvo already fixes up, at least under
some conditions.
There are a few other place that demand vertical timings in fields
but never actually deal with interlaced modes, so use frame timings
for consistency, too. These are:
- lvds panel,
- dvo encoders - dvo is the only way gen2 could support interlaced
mode, but currently we don't support any encoders that do.
- tv out - despite that the tv dac sends out an interlaced signal it
expects a progressive mode pipe configuration.
All these encoders enforce progressive modes by resetting
interlace_allowed.
Hence we always want crtc vertical timings in frames. Enforce this in
our crtc mode_fixup function and rip out any redudant timing
computations from the encoders' mode_fixup function.
v2-4: Adjust the vertical timings a bit.
v5: Split out the 'subtract-one for interlaced' fixes.
v6: Clarify issues around tv-out and gen2.
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Christopher Egert <cme3000@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alfonso Fiore <alfonso.fiore@gmail.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
There is an error in i915_read_blc_pwm_ctl, where the register values
are not being copied correctly. BLC_PWM_CTL and BLC_PWM_CTL2 are
getting mixed up. This patch fixes that so that saveBLC_PWM_CTL2 and
not saveBLC_PWM_CTL is copied to the BLC_PWM_CTL2 register.
Signed-off-by: Simon Que <sque@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
For i945 and earlier chips, the backlight frequency value had the low
bit (of 16) fixed to zero. The Pineview code path handled this by just
exposing the backlight range as 15 bits while other chips had the
backlight range limited to 0 .. 0xfffe.
This patch makes everyone take the pineview code path, providing 15
bits of backlight duty cycle range which seems more than sufficient to
me.
Daniel Mack reported that writing 1 to bit 0 of the duty cycle
register was causing problems on his Samsung X20 notebook, even when
the duty cycle value was less than the maximum backlight value. (He
tried a value of 29749 with max_brightness of 29750). This patch never
writes a '1' to that bit.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
When the brightness property is inquired while the backlight is disabled,
the driver returns a wrong value (zero) because it probes the value after
the backlight was turned off. This caused a black screen even after the
backlight is enabled again. It should return the internal backlight_level
instead, so that it won't be influenced by the backlight-enable state.
BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41926
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/872652
Tested-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Cc: Alex Davis <alex14641@yahoo.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
The commit 47356eb672 introduced a
mechanism to record the backlight level only at disabling time, but it
also introduced a regression. Since intel_lvds_enable() may be called
without disabling (e.g. intel_lvds_commit() calls it unconditionally),
the backlight gets back to the last recorded value. For example, this
happens when you dim the backlight, close the lid and open the lid,
then the backlight suddenly goes to the brightest.
This patch fixes the bug by recording the backlight level always
when changed via intel_panel_set_backlight(). And,
intel_panel_{enable|disable}_backlight() call the internal function not
to update the recorded level wrongly.
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Various issues involved with the space character were generating
warnings in the checkpatch.pl file. This patch removes most of those
warnings.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Joshi <me@akshayjoshi.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@fedoraproject.org>
Tested-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Consider a 1600x900 panel, upscaling a 1360x768 mode, full-aspect. The
old math would give you:
scaled_width = 1600 * 768; /* 1228800 */
scaled_height = 1360 * 900; /* 1224000 */
if (scaled_width > scaled_height) { /* pillarbox, and true */
width = 1224000 / 768; /* int(1593.75) = 1593 */
x = (1600 - 1593 + 1) / 2; /* 4 */
y = 0;
height = 768;
} /* ... */
This is broken. The total width of scanout would then be 1593 + 4 + 4,
or 1601, which is wider than the panel itself. The hardware very
dutifully implements this, and you end up with a black 45° diagonal from
the top-left corner to the bottom edge of the screen. It's a cool
effect and all, but not what you wanted. Similar things happen for the
letterbox case.
The problem is that you have an integer number of pixels, which means
it's usually impossible to upscale equally on both axes. 1360/768 is
1.7708, 1600/900 is 1.7777. Since we're constrained on the one axis,
the other one wants to come out as an even number of pixels (the panel
is almost certainly even on both axes, and the x/y offsets will be
applied on both sides). In the math above, if 'width' comes out even,
rounding down is correct; if it's odd, you'd rather round up. So just
increment width/height in those cases.
Tested on a Lenovo T500 (Ironlake).
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Tested-By: Daniel Manrique <daniel.manrique@canonical.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38851
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
This commit changed an internal radeon structure, that meant a new driver
in -next had to be fixed up, merge in the commit and fix up the driver.
Also fixes a trivial nouveau merge.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
At least on my HP 2540p this is wrong at bootup, fine
at any other time once a lid event has occured. This is due to
_REG vs _INI ordering in the ACPI tables.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 951f3512db
drm/i915: Do not handle backlight combination mode specially
since this commit introduced other regressions due to untouched LBPC
register, e.g. the backlight dimmed after resume.
In addition to the revert, this patch includes a fix for the original
issue (weird backlight levels) by removing the wrong bit shift for
computing the current backlight level.
Also, including typo fixes (lpbc -> lbpc).
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34524
Acked-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Merge in the conflicting eDP fix.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Seems like we are forever to be cursed with buggy firmware, so allow the
user to explicitly set the panel connection status.
Of secondary utility for cases where I run laptops with the lid closed,
but still want to configure the LVDS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
The current code does not follow Intel documentation: It misses some things
and does other, undocumented things. This causes wrong backlight values in
certain conditions. Instead of adding tricky code handling badly documented
and rare corner cases, don't handle combination mode specially at all. This
way PCI_LBPC is never touched and weird things shouldn't happen.
If combination mode is enabled, then the only downside is that changing the
brightness has a greater granularity (the LBPC value), but LBPC is at most
254 and the maximum is in the thousands, so this is no real functional loss.
A potential problem with not handling combined mode is that a brightness of
max * PCI_LBPC is not bright enough. However, this is very unlikely because
from the documentation LBPC seems to act as a scaling factor and doesn't look
like it's supposed to be changed after boot. The value at boot should always
result in a bright enough screen.
IMPORTANT: However, although usually the above is true, it may not be when
people ran an older (2.6.37) kernel which messed up the LBPC register, and
they are unlucky enough to have a BIOS that saves and restores the LBPC value.
Then a good kernel may seem to not work: Max brightness isn't bright enough.
If this happens people should boot back into the old kernel, set brightness
to the maximum, and then reboot. After that everything should be fine.
For more information see the below links. This fixes bugs:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23472http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25072
Signed-off-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Tested-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Share the lid detection code for the all panels for consistent behaviour
and a single place to add the eventual quirks for crap hardware.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
... and not if the maximum is non-zero. This fixes the typo introduced
in 47356eb672 and preserves the backlight value from boot.
[ickle: My thanks also to Indan Zupancic for diagnosing the original
regression and suggesting the appropriate fix.]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # after 47356eb672
By tracking the current status of the backlight we can prevent recording
the value of the current backlight when we have disabled it. And so
prevent restoring it to 'off' after an unbalanced sequence of
intel_lvds_disable/enable.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672
Tested-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
After a GPU reset, the backlight controller registers may be also reset
to 0. In that case we should restore those to the original values
programmed by the BIOS. Note that we still lack the code to handle the
case where the BIOS failed to program those registers at all...
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
There were two instances of code to control the panel backlight and
neither handled the complete set of device variations.
Fixes:
Bug 29716 - [GM965] Regression: Backlight resets to minimum when changing resolution
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29716
And a bug on one of my PineView boxes which overflowed the backlight
value.
Incorporates part of a similar patch by Matthew Garrett that exposes a
native Intel backlight controller.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
v2: Hook in DP paths to keep FULLSCREEN panel fitting on eDP.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
