Commit 7ad728f981
(cpumask: x86: convert cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t)
changed the output of /proc/cpuinfo for siblings:
Example on an AMD Phenom:
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
Before that commit it was:
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
Instead of cpu_core_mask it now uses cpu_sibling_mask to count siblings.
This is due to the following hunk of above commit:
| --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
| +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
| @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinf
| if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
| seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
| seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
| - cpus_weight(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu)));
| + cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
| seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
| seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
| seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
This was a mistake, because the impact line shows that this side-effect
was not anticipated:
Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
So revert the respective hunk to restore the old behavior.
[ Impact: fix sibling-info regression in /proc/cpuinfo ]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
LKML-Reference: <20090504182859.GA29045@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
In most places it's cleaner to use the accessors cpu_sibling_mask()
and cpu_core_mask() wrappers which already exist.
I couldn't avoid cleaning up the access in oprofile, either.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Impact: unification
show_cpuinfo_core is identical for 32 and 64 bit and can be unified,
and CONFIG_X86_HT inherently depends on CONFIG_X86_SMP.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Impact: fix missing CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo after CPU hotunplug/hotreplug
In my test, I found that if a cpu has been offline,
the next cpus may not be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.
if one read() cannot consume the whole /proc/cpuinfo,
c_start() will be called again in the next read() calls.
And *pos has been increased by 1 by the caller(seq_read()).
if this time the cpu#*pos is offline, c_start() will return
NULL, and the next cpus can not be shown.
this fix use next_cpu_nr(*pos - 1, cpu_online_map) to
search the next unshown cpu.
the most easy way to reproduce this bug:
1) offline cpu#1 (cpu#0 is online)
2) dd ibs=2 if=/proc/cpuinfo
the result is that only cpu#0 is shown.
cpu#2 and cpu#3 .... cannot be shown in /proc/cpuinfo
it's bug.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* Use nr_cpu_ids instead of NR_CPUS to limit traversal of cpu online map.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
None of these files use any of the functionality promised by
asm/semaphore.h. It's possible that they rely on it dragging in some
unrelated header file, but I can't build all these files, so we'll have
fix any build failures as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
store initial_apicid from early identify. it is could be different from
phys_proc_id later.
also print it out in /proc/cpuinfo.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Change /proc/cpuinfo on 32-bit, it will look like on 64-bit.
'power management' line is added and power management information
will be printed at the line.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Move the CPU feature string names to a separate file (common to 32
and 64 bits); additionally, make <asm/cpufeature.h> includable by host
code in preparation for including the CPU feature strings in the boot
code.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fix regressions introduced with 92cb7612ae.
It can happen that cpuinfo is displayed for CPUs that are not online or
even worse for CPUs not present at all. As an example, following was
shown for a "second" CPU of a single core K8 variant:
processor : 0
vendor_id : unknown
cpu family : 0
model : 0
model name : unknown
stepping : 0
cache size : 0 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 0
wp : yes
flags :
bogomips : 0.00
clflush size : 0
cache_alignment : 0
address sizes : 0 bits physical, 0 bits virtual
power management:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Additional CPUID strings (sse4_1, sse4_2, sse5, skinit, wdt); fix the
positioning of the AMD ecx strings (cr8_legacy was duplicated under
two different names, so the alignment of all the other strings were
off by one.)
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cpu_data is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that
we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpus.
When NR_CPU count is raised to 4096 the size of cpu_data becomes
3,145,728 bytes.
These changes were adopted from the sparc64 (and ia64) code. An
additional field was added to cpuinfo_x86 to be a non-ambiguous cpu
index. This corresponds to the index into a cpumask_t as well as the
per_cpu index. It's used in various places like show_cpuinfo().
cpu_data is defined to be the boot_cpu_data structure for the NON-SMP
case.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net>
Cc: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This is from an earlier message from 'Christoph Lameter':
cpu_core_map is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that
we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpu.
If we put the cpu_core_map into the per cpu area then it will be allocated
for each processor as it comes online.
This means that the core map cannot be accessed until the per cpu area
has been allocated. Xen does a weird thing here looping over all processors
and zeroing the masks that are not yet allocated and that will be zeroed
when they are allocated. I commented the code out.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Andreas Herrmann