Now I know why I had strange "scheduling in atomic" problems:
acpi_evaluate_integer() does malloc(..., irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC
: GFP_KERNEL)... which is (of course) broken.
There's no way to reliably tell if we need GFP_ATOMIC or not from
code, this one for example fails to detect spinlocks held.
Fortunately, allocation seems small enough to be done on stack.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.
lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
All Reference Objects returned via the AcpiEvaluteObject interface
are now marked as type "REFERENCE" instead of "ANY". The type ANY
is now reservered for NULL objects - either NULL package elements
or unresolved named references.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
And return an error to avoid NULL pointer access by the caller
Lin Ming's patch avoids corrupted mem access when
BIOS has invalid references included, the handle is now zero
instead of corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
replace acpi_util_eval_error macro with static function.
Avoid these sparse warnings due to using buffer within the macro.
drivers/acpi/utils.c:273:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:259:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:279:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:259:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:368:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:375:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:382:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:402:4: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
cosmetic only
Make "module name" actually match the file name.
Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Pavel Machek