net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:46:9: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:46:9: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ipaddr
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:46:9: got restricted unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:68:10: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:68:10: expected unsigned int [unsigned] <noident>
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:68:10: got restricted unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:69:10: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:69:10: expected unsigned int [unsigned] <noident>
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:69:10: got restricted unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:70:10: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:70:10: expected unsigned int [unsigned] <noident>
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:70:10: got restricted unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:71:10: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:71:10: expected unsigned int [unsigned] <noident>
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c:71:10: got restricted unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:20:55: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:20:55: expected unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:20:55: got restricted unsigned int const [usertype] ip
net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:20:55: warning: incorrect type in return expression (different base types)
net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:20:55: expected unsigned int
net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c:20:55: got restricted unsigned int const [usertype] ip
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
This patch fixes a problem when you use 32 nodes in the cluster
match:
% iptables -I PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -m cluster \
--cluster-total-nodes 32 --cluster-local-node 32 \
--cluster-hash-seed 0xdeadbeef -j MARK --set-mark 0xffff
iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information.
% dmesg | tail -1
xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be higher than the total number of nodes
The problem is related to this checking:
if (info->node_mask >= (1 << info->total_nodes)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be "
"higher than the total number of nodes\n");
return false;
}
(1 << 32) is 1. Thus, the checking fails.
BTW, I said this before but I insist: I have only tested the cluster
match with 2 nodes getting ~45% extra performance in an active-active setup.
The maximum limit of 32 nodes is still completely arbitrary. I'd really
appreciate if people that have more nodes in their setups let me know.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
This patch fixes a dependency with IPv6:
ERROR: "__ipv6_addr_type" [net/netfilter/xt_cluster.ko] undefined!
This patch adds a function that checks if the higher bits of the
address is 0xFF to identify a multicast address, instead of adding a
dependency due to __ipv6_addr_type(). I came up with this idea after
Patrick McHardy pointed possible problems with runtime module
dependencies.
Reported-by: Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch adds the iptables cluster match. This match can be used
to deploy gateway and back-end load-sharing clusters. The cluster
can be composed of 32 nodes maximum (although I have only tested
this with two nodes, so I cannot tell what is the real scalability
limit of this solution in terms of cluster nodes).
Assuming that all the nodes see all packets (see below for an
example on how to do that if your switch does not allow this), the
cluster match decides if this node has to handle a packet given:
(jhash(source IP) % total_nodes) & node_mask
For related connections, the master conntrack is used. The following
is an example of its use to deploy a gateway cluster composed of two
nodes (where this is the node 1):
iptables -I PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -m cluster \
--cluster-total-nodes 2 --cluster-local-node 1 \
--cluster-proc-name eth1 -j MARK --set-mark 0xffff
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 \
-m mark ! --mark 0xffff -j DROP
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 -m cluster \
--cluster-total-nodes 2 --cluster-local-node 1 \
--cluster-proc-name eth2 -j MARK --set-mark 0xffff
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth2 \
-m mark ! --mark 0xffff -j DROP
And the following commands to make all nodes see the same packets:
ip maddr add 01:00:5e:00:01:01 dev eth1
ip maddr add 01:00:5e:00:01:02 dev eth2
arptables -I OUTPUT -o eth1 --h-length 6 \
-j mangle --mangle-mac-s 01:00:5e:00:01:01
arptables -I INPUT -i eth1 --h-length 6 \
--destination-mac 01:00:5e:00:01:01 \
-j mangle --mangle-mac-d 00:zz:yy:xx:5a:27
arptables -I OUTPUT -o eth2 --h-length 6 \
-j mangle --mangle-mac-s 01:00:5e:00:01:02
arptables -I INPUT -i eth2 --h-length 6 \
--destination-mac 01:00:5e:00:01:02 \
-j mangle --mangle-mac-d 00:zz:yy:xx:5a:27
In the case of TCP connections, pickup facility has to be disabled
to avoid marking TCP ACK packets coming in the reply direction as
valid.
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp_loose
BTW, some final notes:
* This match mangles the skbuff pkt_type in case that it detects
PACKET_MULTICAST for a non-multicast address. This may be done in
a PKTTYPE target for this sole purpose.
* This match supersedes the CLUSTERIP target.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy