linux

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ben Dooks	02b7dd1244	[ARM] 2926/1: .proc.info - postfix section with .init for `make buildcheck` Patch from Ben Dooks The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .proc.info list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself postfixed with .init Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>	2005-09-20 16:35:03 +01:00
Linus Torvalds	1da177e4c3	Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!	2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Ben Dooks

02b7dd1244

[ARM] 2926/1: .proc.info - postfix section with .init for `make buildcheck`

Patch from Ben Dooks

The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .proc.info
list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself
postfixed with .init

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

2005-09-20 16:35:03 +01:00

Linus Torvalds

1da177e4c3

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

2 Commits (a80da7389891d0eeacbd568a9b54f665fd424d14)