Introduce a new function try_offline_node() to remove sysfs file of node
when all memory sections of this node are removed. If some memory
sections of this node are not removed, this function does nothing.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related
problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure.
First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with
acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct
acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created),
those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races
from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present
for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by
acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler).
Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and
acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock
should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by
these functions themselves.
For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device
addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the
acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim().
Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they
are always called under acpi_scan_lock.
Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously
with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help
of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the
ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example,
acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and
the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that
acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct
acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be
invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that,
make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on
ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if
their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear
the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work).
Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail,
in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the
context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to
run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on
previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used
by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver
through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device
object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver
.remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.
For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and
get the device pointer again later.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When memory hotadd, acpi_memory_enable_device has already been done
at drv->ops.add (acpi_memory_device_add), no need to do it again
at notify callback.
At acpi_memory_enable_device, acpi_memory_get_device_resources
is also a redundant action, since it has been done at drv->ops.add.
Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).
For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).
Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
We had introduced acpi_hotmem_initialized to avoid strange add_memory fail
message. But the memory device may not be used by the kernel, and the
device should be bound when the driver is being loaded. Remove
acpi_hotmem_initialized to allow that the device can be bound when the
driver is being loaded.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We eject the memory device even if it is in use. It is very dangerous,
and it will cause the kernel to be panicked.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If acpi_memory_enable_device() fails, acpi_memory_enable_device() will
return a non-zero value, which means we fail to bind the memory device to
this driver. So we should free memory device before
acpi_memory_device_add() returns.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We allocate memory to store acpi_memory_info, so we should free it before
freeing mem_device.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
We handle the 1st case in the module acpi_memhotplug, and handle
the 2nd case in ACPI eject notification. This 2 events may happen
at the same time, so we may touch acpi_memory_device.res_list at
the same time. This patch reimplements memory-hotremove support
through an ACPI eject notification. Now the memory device is
offlined and hotremoved only in the function acpi_memory_device_remove()
which is protected by device_lock().
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug or a driver initialization
fails.
acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct. But
acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.
So the patch move offlining memory and releasing acpi_memory_info struct
codes to a new function acpi_memory_remove_memory(). And it is used by both
acpi_memory_device_remove() and acpi_memory_disable_device().
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The memory device has been ejected and powoffed, so we can call
acpi_bus_trim() to remove the memory device from acpi bus.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Changed acpi_memory_device_notify() to call ACPI _OST method
when ACPI memory hotplug operation has completed.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
The existing interface only has a pre-order callback. This change
adds an additional parameter for a post-order callback which will
be more useful for bus scans. ACPICA BZ 779.
Also update the external calls to acpi_walk_namespace.
http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=779
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface.
Changes include:
- Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings
- Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.)
- Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object
- Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge
- Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO.
These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface.
See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details.
Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
If the memory block size is zero, ignore it and don't do the memory hotplug
flowchart. Otherwise it will complain the following warning message:
>System RAM resource 0 - ffffffffffffffff cannot be added
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Don't treat the generic error as ACPI error code. Otherwise when the generic
code is returned, it will complain the following warning messag:
>ACPI Exception (acpi_memhotplug-0171): UNKNOWN_STATUS_CODE,
Cannot get acpi bus device [20080609]
>ACPI: Cannot find driver data
> ACPI Error (utglobal-0127): Unknown exception code: 0xFFFFFFED [20080609]
> Pid: 85, comm: kacpi_notify Not tainted 2.6.27.19-5-default #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8020da29>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x41/0x58
[<ffffffff8049a3da>] dump_stack+0x69/0x6f
.....
At the same time when the generic error code is returned, the ACPI_EXCEPTION
is replaced by the printk.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch folds the .start() method into .add().
The .start() method is called in two paths: boot-time device enumeration
and run-time node addition, currently via container_device_add(). In both
cases, .start() is called immediately after .add(), so there's no reason
to make them separate methods.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
CC: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fix misspelling of "firmware" in acpi_memhotplug.c
It's spelled "firmware".
Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Move all the component definitions for drivers to a single shared place,
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
ACPI_DB_ERROR and ACPI_DB_WARN were removed from ACPICA core.
So replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX ...)
and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN, ...) with printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX ...)
We do not use ACPI_ERROR/ACPI_WARNING since they're not exported, see
-------------------------------------------------------------
commit 6468463abd
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Mon Jun 26 23:41:38 2006 -0400
ACPI: un-export ACPI_ERROR() -- use printk(KERN_ERR...)
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.
lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Catch attempts to use of acpi_driver_data on pointers of wrong type.
akpm: rewritten to use proper C typechecking and remove the
"function"-used-as-lvalue thing.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
modpost is going to use these to create e.g. acpi:ACPI0001
in modules.alias.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
No need to duplicate the existing definitions in include/acpi/actypes.h.
syntax only -- no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
It was erroneously used as a description rather than a name.
ie. turn this:
lenb@se7525gp2:/sys> ls bus/acpi/drivers
ACPI AC Adapter Driver ACPI Embedded Controller Driver ACPI Power Resource Driver
ACPI Battery Driver ACPI Fan Driver ACPI Processor Driver
ACPI Button Driver ACPI PCI Interrupt Link Driver ACPI Thermal Zone Driver
ACPI container driver ACPI PCI Root Bridge Driver hpet
into this:
lenb@se7525gp2:~> ls /sys/bus/acpi/drivers
ac battery button container ec fan hpet pci_link pci_root power processor thermal
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
cosmetic only
Make "module name" actually match the file name.
Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
I wrote a patch to avoid redundant memory hot-add call at boot time. This
was cause of strange fail message of memory hotplug like "ACPI: add_memory
failed". Memory is recognized by early boot code with EFI/E820.
But, if DSDT describes memory devices for them, then hot-add code is called
for already recognized memory, and it shows fail messages with -EEXIST.
So, sys admin will misunderstand this message as something wrong by it.
This patch avoids them by preventing redundant hot-add call until
completion of driver initialization.
[akpm@osdl.org: cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
I suppose this message seems quite useless except debugging. It just shows
"Hotplug Mem Device". System admin can't know anything by this message.
So, I would like to change it to KERN_DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
In cases where the acpi memory-add event does not containe the pxm (node)
infomation allow the driver to look up node info based on the address. The
acpi_get_node call returns -1 if it can't decode the pxm info, this causes
add_memory to panic. acpi_get_node would have to decode the resource from the
handle (a lenghty proposition). This seems to be the cleanist point to
interject the hook.
[kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: build fixes]
[y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com: build fixes]
Signed-off-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This is to remove noisy useless message at boot. The message is a ton of
"ACPI Exception (acpi_memory-0492): AE_ERROR, handle is no memory device"
In my emulation, number of memory devices are not so many (only 6), but,
this messages are displayed 114 times.
It is showed by acpi_memory_register_notify_handler() which is called by
acpi_walk_namespace().
acpi_walk_namespace() parses all of ACPI's namespace and execute
acpi_memory_register_notify_handler(). So, it is called for all of the
device which is defined in namespace. If the parsing device is not memory,
acpi_memhotplug ignores it due to "no match" and will parse next device.
This is normal route, not an exception.
Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
both of acpi_memory_enable_device() and acpi_memory_add_device() may evaluate
_CRS method.
We should avoid evaluate device's resource twice if we could get it
successfully in past.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@gmail.com>
Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
add_memory() does all necessary check to avoid collision. then, acpi layer
doesn't have to check region by itself.
(*) pfn_valid() just returns page struct is valid or not. It returns 0
if a section has been already added even is ioresource is not added.
ioresource collision check in mm/memory_hotplug.c can do more precise
collistion check.
added enabled bit check just for sanity check..
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@gmail.com>
Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Tang Chen