The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match
the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps().
We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector > 0:
voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE
RANGE is either x1 or x2
So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when
calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps()
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Pass regulator id rahter than the index to lp872x_find_regulator_init_data(),
then the code can be simpler.
We can also get max_regulators by lp->num_regulators.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Milo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>
Tested-by: Milo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
According to the datasheet, the voltage for twl6030ldo_ops is not linear for
all cases. Linear mapping is only for the selection code from
00000001 to 00011000.
Table 9. LDO Output Voltage Selection Code
CODE VOUT(V) COD VOUT(V) CODE VOUT(V) CODE VOUT(V)
00000000 0 00001000 1.7 00010000 2.5 00011000 3.3
00000001 1.0 00001001 1.8 00010001 2.6 00011001 Reserved
00000010 1.1 00001010 1.9 00010010 2.7 00011010 Reserved
00000011 1.2 00001011 2.0 00010011 2.8 00011011 Reserved
00000100 1.3 00001100 2.1 00010100 2.9 00011100 Reserved
00000101 1.4 00001101 2.2 00010101 3.0 00011101 Reserved
00000110 1.5 00001110 2.3 00010110 3.1 00011110 Reserved
00000111 1.6 00001111 2.4 00010111 3.2 00011111 2.75
This patch implements the list_voltage callback based on above table.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
In twl6030ldo_set_voltage, current code use below formula to calculate vsel:
vsel = (min_uV/1000 - 1000)/100 + 1;
This is worng because when min_uV is 1000000 uV, vsel is 1.
It should be 0 in this case.
Fix it by change the equation to: (This equation is common for linear mapping)
vsel = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - rdev->desc->min_uV, rdev->desc->uV_step);
In twl6030ldo_get_voltage, current code use below formula to calculate voltage:
mV = 1000mv + 100mv * (vsel - 1)
This is worng because when vsel is 0, mV is 900mV. Note the min_uV is 1000mV.
Fix it by change the equation to: (This equation is common for linear mapping)
return rdev->desc->min_uV + vsel * rdev->desc->uV_step;
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Convert to devm_gpio_request to save a few error handling code.
This patch properly handle the gpio_request failure, we should return error
when gpio_request fails rather than just show warning.
I think one of the reason we got -EBUSY is because current code does not free
gpios in s5m8767_pmic_remove(). So it got -EBUSY when reload the module.
Yest another reason is in current code if gpio_request() returns error,
the rest of the code still calls gpio_direction_output to config buck_gpios
and buck_ds gpios. This looks wrong to me.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Convert to devm_gpio_request to save a few error handling code.
This patch properly handle the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY, we should
return error rather than ommit the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY.
I think one of the reason we got -EBUSY is because current code does not free
gpios in max8997_pmic_remove(). So it got -EBUSY when reload the module.
Yest another reason is in current code if gpio_request() returns -EBUSY,
the rest of the code still calls gpio_direction_output to config buck125_gpios
and set gpio value in max8997_set_gpio(). This looks wrong to me.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Use devm_ version of gpio APIs gpio_request_one() for
requesting gpios.
This avoid extra code for freeing gpios.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
There is multiple voltage input pins on device which
takes the voltage input for different voltage regulator.
Support to configure the voltage input supplied by
different regulator for each regulators.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit adds device tree support for tps65217 pmic. And usage
details are added to device tree documentation. Driver is tested
by using kernel module with regulator set and get APIs.
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Both min_uV and max_uV are not used in the code, remove them.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Initialize config.of_node for regulator before registering.
This is needed for DT based regulator support.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Currently s2mps11->iodev, s2mps11->dev and config.dev point to NULL.
This patch fixes the settings for config.dev.
Current code does not need the *dev and *iodev of struct s2mps11_info,
so remove them.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The tps65910 mfd driver has been converted to regmap APIs.
This patch adds tps65910_reg_update_bits() in include/linux/mfd/tps65910.h.
Thus we can use tps65910_reg_read/tps65910_reg_write/tps65910_reg_update_bits
directly and remove tps65910_reg_[read|modify_bits|read_locked|write_locked]
functions. With this change, we can also remove the mutex in struct tps65910_reg.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This patch add Samsung S2MPS11 regulator driver.
The S2MPS11 can support 10 Bucks and 38 LDOs and RTC.
Especially, S2MPS11 is designed for high performance
Samsung application processor.
Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Recent change in the core driver to get the maximum voltage
is based on the (n_voltages -1) steps of voltage.
For the tps65910, the (n_voltages -1)th step voltage is
calculated based on the callback function list_voltage.
This function direct maps the datasheet and adjust the
first few steps for initial voltage as per datasheet,
and hence initialize the n_voltages based on datasheet.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Using the same ops for both [en|dis]able and set_suspend_[en|dis]able
callbacks is actively broken. This patch removes .set_suspend_disable and
.set_suspend_enable callback setting.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Using the same ops for both .disable and .set_suspend_disable callbacks is
actively broken. This patch removes .set_suspend_disable callback setting.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Now of_regulator_match() returns without finding the match if match->of_node
is not NULL.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
There is multiple voltage input pins on device which
takes the voltage input for different voltage regulator.
Support to configure the voltage input supplied by
different regulator for each regulators.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Add support for input supply in DT parsing of node.
The input supply will be provided by the property
"vin-supply" in the regulator node.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This patch device tree support for regulator driver. It uses the parent
(mfd's) DT node to parse the regulator data for max77686.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is ok to request current limit with min_uA < chip->min_uA and
max_uA > chip->max_uA.
We need to set min_uA = chip->min_uA if (min_uA < chip->min_uA),
this ensures the equation to calcuate selator does not return negative number.
Also set max_uA = chip->max_uA if (max_uA > chip->max_uA), as suggested by
Sonic.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This is essentially the code that was factored out into the core when the
feature was implemented.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is very common for regulators to support having their enable signal
controlled by a GPIO. Since there are a bunch of fiddly things to get
right like handling the operations when the enable signal is tied to
a rail and it's just replicated code add support for this to the core.
Drivers should set ena_gpio in their config if they have a GPIO control,
using ena_gpio_flags to specify any flags (including GPIOF_OUT_INIT_ for
the initial state) and ena_gpio_invert if the GPIO is active low. The
core will then override any enable and disable operations the driver has
and instead control the specified GPIO.
This will in the future also allow us to further extend the core by
identifying when several enable signals have been tied together and
handling this properly.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Create new _regulator_do_enable() and _regulator_do_disable() operations
which deal with the mechanics of performing the enable and disable, partly
to cut down on the levels of indentation and partly to support some future
work.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Many regulators have a fixed specification for their enable time. Allow
this to be set in the regulator_desc as a number to save them having to
implement an explicit operation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
A recursive lockdep warning occurs if you call
regulator_set_optimum_mode() on a regulator with a supply because
there is no nesting annotation for the rdev->mutex. To avoid this
warning, get the supply's load before locking the regulator's
mutex to avoid grabbing the same class of lock twice.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.4.0 #3257 Tainted: G W
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
(&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036e9e0>] regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38
but task is already holding lock:
(&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&rdev->mutex);
lock(&rdev->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
#0: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb48>] __driver_attach+0x40/0x8c
#1: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb58>] __driver_attach+0x50/0x8c
#2: (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224
stack backtrace:
[<c001521c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080)
[<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080) from [<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10)
[<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10) from [<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8)
[<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8) from [<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4)
[<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4) from [<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38)
[<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38) from [<c036efb8>] (regulator_set_optimum_mode+0xa4/0x224)
...
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Match the device's regulators with the property of
"regulator-compatible" of each regulator node.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is ok to request voltage with min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV and
max_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV.
The equation we used in uv_to_vsel() does not allow
min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV, otherwise it returns negative selector.
So we need to set min_uV = tps->info[rid]->min_uV if
min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This permits the setting of bogus values because the invalidity check is
itself invalid.
Reported-by: dcb314@hotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Axel Lin