Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
<mach/pxa25x.h> - for pxa25x based platforms
<mach/pxa27x.h> - for pxa27x based platforms
<mach/pxa300.h> - for pxa300 based platforms
<mach/pxa320.h> - for pxa320 based platforms
<mach/pxa930.h> - for pxa930 based platforms
NOTE:
1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
board code:
<mach/hardware.h>
<mach/pxa-regs.h>
<mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
<mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
<mach/mfp.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
The gpio setup for AM200 specific GPIO pins should be done in the AM200
code rather than in generic gumstix code.
Signed-off-by: Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
The original am200epd driver was designed with bad assumptions. It
manipulated GPSR/GPLR registers directly. It relied on direct access to the
pxa LCDC registers which have since conflicted with commit
ce4fb7b892 . This patch moves it into mach-pxa
and overhauls it to use a fb obtained through fb notifiers. It now uses the
generic GPIO api.
Signed-off-by: Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Eric Miao