64-bit hypercall interface can pass a maddr in one argument rather
than splitting it.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Use callback_op hypercall to register callbacks in a 32/64-bit
independent way (64-bit doesn't need a code segment, but that detail
is hidden in XEN_CALLBACK).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The 64-bit calling convention for hypercalls uses different registers
from 32-bit. Annoyingly, gcc's asm syntax doesn't have a way to
specify one of the extra numeric reigisters in a constraint, so we
must use explicitly placed register variables. Given that we have to
do it for some args, may as well do it for all.
Also fix syntax gcc generates for the call instruction itself. We
need a plain direct call, but the asm expansion which works on 32-bit
generates a rip-relative addressing mode in 64-bit, which is treated
as an indirect call. The alternative is to pass the hypercall page
offset into the asm, and have it add it to the hypercall page start
address to generate the call.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
64-bit guests can pass 64-bit quantities in a single argument,
so fix up the hypercalls.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Use the new sched_op hypercall, mainly because xenner doesn't support
the old one.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Xen will trap and emulate clts, but its better to use a hypercall.
Also, xenner doesn't handle clts.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the
header install make rules
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-11 11:20:03 +02:00
Renamed from include/asm-i386/xen/hypercall.h (Browse further)
