Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christoph Hellwig
13571a6977 hfsplus: validate btree flags
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
2010-10-14 09:54:23 -04:00
Eric Sandeen
9250f92597 hfsplus: handle more on-disk corruptions without oopsing
hfs seems prone to bad things when it encounters on disk corruption.  Many
values are read from disk, and used as lengths to memcpy, as an example.
This patch fixes up several of these problematic cases.

o sanity check the on-disk maximum key lengths on mount
  (these are set to a defined value at mkfs time and shouldn't differ)
o check on-disk node keylens against the maximum key length for each tree
o fix hfs_btree_open so that going out via free_tree: doesn't wind
  up in hfs_releasepage, which wants to follow the very pointer
  we were trying to set up:
	HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree = hfs_btree_open()
    .
  failure gets to hfs_releasepage and tries to follow HFS_SB(sb)->cat_tree

Tested with the fsfuzzer; it survives more than it used to.

[hch: ported of commit cf05946250 from hfs]
[hch: added the fixes from 5581d018ed3493d226e7a4d645d9c8a5af6c36b]

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
2010-10-14 09:53:48 -04:00
Al Viro
b6b41424f0 hfsplus: hfs_bnode_find() can fail, resulting in hfs_bnode_split() breakage
oops and fs corruption; the latter can happen even on valid fs in case of oom.

[hch: port of commit 3d10a15d69 from hfs]

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
2010-10-14 09:53:42 -04:00
Roman Zippel
634725a929 [PATCH] hfs: cleanup HFS+ prints
Add the log level and a "hfs: " prefix to all kernel prints.  (HFS and HFS+
will use the same prefix, as they share some code and could be merged at some
point.)

Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-18 19:20:22 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00