Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Woodhouse
e17fc0a1cc Allow elevators to sort/merge discard requests
But blkdev_issue_discard() still emits requests which are interpreted as
soft barriers, because naïve callers might otherwise issue subsequent
writes to those same sectors, which might cross on the queue (if they're
reallocated quickly enough).

Callers still _can_ issue non-barrier discard requests, but they have to
take care of queue ordering for themselves.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-10-09 08:56:02 +02:00
OGAWA Hirofumi
2ebca85abc Use WRITE_BARRIER in blkdev_issue_flush(), not (1<<BIO_RW_BARRIER)
Barriers should be submitted with the WRITE flag set.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-10-09 08:56:02 +02:00
David Woodhouse
fb2dce862d Add 'discard' request handling
Some block devices benefit from a hint that they can forget the contents
of certain sectors. Add basic support for this to the block core, along
with a 'blkdev_issue_discard()' helper function which issues such
requests.

The caller doesn't get to provide an end_io functio, since
blkdev_issue_discard() will automatically split the request up into
multiple bios if appropriate. Neither does the function wait for
completion -- it's expected that callers won't care about when, or even
_if_, the request completes. It's only a hint to the device anyway. By
definition, the file system doesn't _care_ about these sectors any more.

[With feedback from OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> and
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com]

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-10-09 08:56:01 +02:00
Harvey Harrison
24c03d47d0 block: remove remaining __FUNCTION__ occurrences
__FUNCTION__ is gcc specific, use __func__

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-05-01 08:04:02 -07:00
FUJITA Tomonori
2a4aa30c5f block: rename and export rq_init()
This rename rq_init() blk_rq_init() and export it. Any path that hands
the request to the block layer needs to call it to initialize the
request.

This is a preparation for large command support, which needs to
initialize the request in a proper way (that is, just doing a memset()
will not work).

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-04-29 14:48:55 +02:00
Adrian Bunk
6f6a036e6e block/blk-barrier.c:blk_ordered_cur_seq() mustn't be inline
This patch fixes the following build error with UML and gcc 4.3:

<--  snip  -->

...
  CC      block/blk-barrier.o
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/block/blk-barrier.c: In function ‘blk_do_ordered’:
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/block/blk-barrier.c:57: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to ‘blk_ordered_cur_seq’: function body not available
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/block/blk-barrier.c:252: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/block/blk-barrier.c:57: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to ‘blk_ordered_cur_seq’: function body not available
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/block/blk-barrier.c:253: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
make[2]: *** [block/blk-barrier.o] Error 1

<--  snip  -->

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-04-29 14:48:54 +02:00
FUJITA Tomonori
1afb20f301 block: make rq_init() do a full memset()
This requires moving rq_init() from get_request() to blk_alloc_request().
The upside is that we can now require an rq_init() from any path that
wishes to hand the request to the block layer.

rq_init() will be exported for the code that uses struct request
without blk_get_request.

This is a preparation for large command support, which needs to
initialize struct request in a proper way (that is, just doing a
memset() will not work).

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-04-29 09:50:34 +02:00
Jens Axboe
cc66b4512c block: fix blkdev_issue_flush() not detecting and passing EOPNOTSUPP back
This is important to eg dm, that tries to decide whether to stop using
barriers or not.

Tested as working by Anders Henke <anders.henke@1und1.de>

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-03-04 11:47:46 +01:00
Jens Axboe
6728cb0e63 block: make core bits checkpatch compliant
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-02-01 09:26:33 +01:00
Jens Axboe
86db1e2977 block: continue ll_rw_blk.c splitup
Adds files for barrier handling, rq execution, io context handling,
mapping data to requests, and queue settings.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2008-01-29 21:55:08 +01:00