On some CPUs, bit 4 of section mappings means "update the
cache when written to". On others, this bit is required to
be one, and others it's required to be zero. Finally, on
ARMv6 and above, setting it turns on "no execute" and prevents
speculative prefetches.
With all these combinations, no one value fits all CPUs, so we
have to pick a value depending on the CPU type, and the area
we're mapping.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Most MMU-based CPUs have a restriction on the setting of the data cache
enable and mmu enable bits in the control register, whereby if the data
cache is enabled, the MMU must also be enabled. Enabling the data
cache without the MMU is an invalid combination.
However, there are CPUs where the data cache can be enabled without the
MMU.
In order to allow these CPUs to take advantage of that, provide a
method whereby each proc-*.S file defines the control regsiter value
for use with nommu (with the MMU disabled.) Later on, when we add
support for enabling the MMU on these devices, we can adjust the
"crval" macro to also enable the data cache for nommu.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
The "id(wb)BRR" suffix reports which CPU debugging options were (or
were not) selected at kernel build time. Rather than have every
proc-*.S file implement this, report the control register value,
from which this information can be deduced.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
In noMMU mode, various of functions which are defined in mm/proc-*.S
is not valid or needed to be avoided. i.g. switch_mm is not needed,
just returns and this makes the I & D caches are valid which shows
great improvement of performance including task switching and IPC.
Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Move the hardware PMD and PTE page table definitions from pgtable.h
into pgtable-hwdef.h, and include pgtable-hwdef.h as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Ben Dooks
The `make buildcheck` is erroneously reporting that the .proc.info
list is referencing items in the .init section as it is not itself
postfixed with .init
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Russell King