Compilation for this board yields the following errors:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c:511: error: 'FFUART' undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c:520: error: 'BTUART' undeclared here (not in a function)
arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c:529: error: 'STUART' undeclared here (not in a function)
Fix them by including the necessary header.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martins <rasm@fe.up.pt>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Move the processor specific initialization (largely resources initialization)
out of soc_common_drv_pcmcia_probe() into dedicated sa11xx_drv_pcmcia_probe()
and __pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_probe().
By doing this, we are now able to move the PCMCIA related definitions out of
pxa-regs.h and back into pxa2xx_base.c.
As a result, remove that reference of _PCMCIA1IO in arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c.
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
<mach/pxa25x.h> - for pxa25x based platforms
<mach/pxa27x.h> - for pxa27x based platforms
<mach/pxa300.h> - for pxa300 based platforms
<mach/pxa320.h> - for pxa320 based platforms
<mach/pxa930.h> - for pxa930 based platforms
NOTE:
1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
board code:
<mach/hardware.h>
<mach/pxa-regs.h>
<mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
<mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
<mach/mfp.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
The ISA IRQ renumbering broke the Viper ISA code in interesting ways.
It originally assumed that ISA interrupt were numbered in the order that
is defined by the CPLD registers. Unfortunately, this is no longer the
case.
Furthermore, the viper_irq_handler() function being a chained IRQ
handler, it must ACK the interrupt by itself, or the handler will be
immediately reentered, with the expected damages.
This fix was made possible thanks to the help of David Raeman, who
provided debug information and tested each version of this patch.
Tested-by: David Raeman <david.raeman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Eric Miao