Commit graph

66 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Torvalds
1c1afa3c05 Merge master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/steve/gfs2-2.6-nmw
* master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/steve/gfs2-2.6-nmw: (73 commits)
  [DLM] Clean up lowcomms
  [GFS2] Change gfs2_fsync() to use write_inode_now()
  [GFS2] Fix indent in recovery.c
  [GFS2] Don't flush everything on fdatasync
  [GFS2] Add a comment about reading the super block
  [GFS2] Mount problem with the GFS2 code
  [GFS2] Remove gfs2_check_acl()
  [DLM] fix format warnings in rcom.c and recoverd.c
  [GFS2] lock function parameter
  [DLM] don't accept replies to old recovery messages
  [DLM] fix size of STATUS_REPLY message
  [GFS2] fs/gfs2/log.c:log_bmap() fix printk format warning
  [DLM] fix add_requestqueue checking nodes list
  [GFS2] Fix recursive locking in gfs2_getattr
  [GFS2] Fix recursive locking in gfs2_permission
  [GFS2] Reduce number of arguments to meta_io.c:getbuf()
  [GFS2] Move gfs2_meta_syncfs() into log.c
  [GFS2] Fix journal flush problem
  [GFS2] mark_inode_dirty after write to stuffed file
  [GFS2] Fix glock ordering on inode creation
  ...
2006-12-07 09:13:20 -08:00
Christoph Lameter
e18b890bb0 [PATCH] slab: remove kmem_cache_t
Replace all uses of kmem_cache_t with struct kmem_cache.

The patch was generated using the following script:

	#!/bin/sh
	#
	# Replace one string by another in all the kernel sources.
	#

	set -e

	for file in `find * -name "*.c" -o -name "*.h"|xargs grep -l $1`; do
		quilt add $file
		sed -e "1,\$s/$1/$2/g" $file >/tmp/$$
		mv /tmp/$$ $file
		quilt refresh
	done

The script was run like this

	sh replace kmem_cache_t "struct kmem_cache"

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-12-07 08:39:25 -08:00
Patrick Caulfield
ac33d07105 [DLM] Clean up lowcomms
This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek
with comments below indicating why some things have been left:

Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc)
>> +{
>> +	struct nodeinfo *ni;
>> +	int r;
>> +	int n;
>> +
>> +	down_read(&nodeinfo_lock);
>
> Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful.
>
> I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'.  That's in fact
> a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH).  I doubt if that's what you really
> meant.  Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka
> GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0".  In fact "0" is the
> least reliable mode possible.
>
> IOW, this is all bollixed up.

When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a
new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo
struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance.
I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!)

>> +/* Data received from remote end */
>> +static int receive_from_sock(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	struct msghdr msg;
>> +	struct kvec iov[2];
>> +	unsigned len;
>> +	int r;
>> +	struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo;
>> +	struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
>> +	struct nodeinfo *ni;
>> +
>> +	/* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this
>> +	 * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be
>> +	 * OK.
>> +	 */
>> +	static struct sockaddr_storage msgname;
>> +	static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))];
>
> whoa.  This is globally singly-threaded code??

Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd.
>>
>> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid)
>> +{
>> +	struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr;
>> +	static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))];
>
> Another static buffer to worry about.  Globally singly-threaded code?

Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd.

>> +
>> +/* Send a message */
>> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	struct writequeue_entry *e;
>> +	int len, offset;
>> +	struct msghdr outmsg;
>> +	static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))];
>
> Singly-threaded?

Yep.

>>
>> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) {
>> +		struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0);
>> +		if (ni) {
>> +			idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i);
>
> Didn't that need locking?

Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads
have been stopped.

>>
>> +static int write_list_empty(void)
>> +{
>> +	int status;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock);
>> +	status = list_empty(&write_nodes);
>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock);
>> +
>> +	return status;
>> +}
>
> This function's return value is meaningless.  As soon as the lock gets
> dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality.
>
> Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and
> dangerous thing.  Really the locking should be moved into the caller.

It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work
to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up
when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival).

The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't
really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other
startup or shutdown bug to be honest.


Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-07 09:25:13 -05:00
Ryusuke Konishi
57adf7eede [DLM] fix format warnings in rcom.c and recoverd.c
This fixes the following gcc warnings generated on
the architectures where uint64_t != unsigned long long (e.g. ppc64).

fs/dlm/rcom.c:154: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/rcom.c:154: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:48: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:202: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:210: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke@osrg.net>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:22 -05:00
David Teigland
98f176fb32 [DLM] don't accept replies to old recovery messages
We often abort a recovery after sending a status request to a remote node.
We want to ignore any potential status reply we get from the remote node.
If we get one of these unwanted replies, we've often moved on to the next
recovery message and incremented the message sequence counter, so the
reply will be ignored due to the seq number.  In some cases, we've not
moved on to the next message so the seq number of the reply we want to
ignore is still correct, causing the reply to be accepted.  The next
recovery message will then mistake this old reply as a new one.

To fix this, we add the flag RCOM_WAIT to indicate when we can accept a
new reply.  We clear this flag if we abort recovery while waiting for a
reply.  Before the flag is set again (to allow new replies) we know that
any old replies will be rejected due to their sequence number.  We also
initialize the recovery-message sequence number to a random value when a
lockspace is first created.  This makes it clear when messages are being
rejected from an old instance of a lockspace that has since been
recreated.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:14 -05:00
David Teigland
1babdb4531 [DLM] fix size of STATUS_REPLY message
When the not_ready routine sends a "fake" status reply with blank status
flags, it needs to use the correct size for a normal STATUS_REPLY by
including the size of the would-be config parameters.  We also fill in the
non-existant config parameters with an invalid lvblen value so it's easier
to notice if these invalid paratmers are ever being used.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:08 -05:00
David Teigland
2896ee37cc [DLM] fix add_requestqueue checking nodes list
Requests that arrive after recovery has started are saved in the
requestqueue and processed after recovery is done.  Some of these requests
are purged during recovery if they are from nodes that have been removed.
We move the purging of the requests (dlm_purge_requestqueue) to later in
the recovery sequence which allows the routine saving requests
(dlm_add_requestqueue) to avoid filtering out requests by nodeid since the
same will be done by the purge.  The current code has add_requestqueue
filtering by nodeid but doesn't hold any locks when accessing the list of
current nodes.  This also means that we need to call the purge routine
when the lockspace is being shut down since the add routine will not be
rejecting requests itself any more.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:00 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
b98c95af01 [DLM] Fix DLM config
The attached patch fixes the DLM config so that it selects the chosen network
transport. It should fix the bug where DLM can be left selected when NET gets
unselected. This incorporates all the comments received about this patch.

Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:41 -05:00
David Teigland
6f90a8b1b8 [DLM] clear sbflags on lock master
RH BZ 211622

The ALTMODE flag can be set in the lock master's copy of the lock but
never cleared, so ALTMODE will also be returned in a subsequent conversion
of the lock when it shouldn't be.  This results in lock_dlm incorrectly
switching to the alternate lock mode when returning the result to gfs
which then asserts when it sees the wrong lock state.  The fix is to
propagate the cleared sbflags value to the master node when the lock is
requested.  QA's d_rwrandirectlarge test triggers this bug very quickly.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:27 -05:00
David Teigland
4b77f2c93d [DLM] do full recover_locks barrier
Red Hat BZ 211914

The previous patch "[DLM] fix aborted recovery during
node removal" was incomplete as discovered with further testing.  It set
the bit for the RS_LOCKS barrier but did not then wait for the barrier.
This is often ok, but sometimes it will cause yet another recovery hang.
If it's a new node that also has the lowest nodeid that skips the barrier
wait, then it misses the important step of collecting and reporting the
barrier status from the other nodes (which is the job of the low nodeid in
the barrier wait routine).

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:24 -05:00
David Teigland
2cdc98aaf0 [DLM] fix stopping unstarted recovery
Red Hat BZ 211914

When many nodes are joining a lockspace simultaneously, the dlm gets a
quick sequence of stop/start events, a pair for adding each node.
dlm_controld in user space sends dlm_recoverd in the kernel each stop and
start event.  dlm_controld will sometimes send the stop before
dlm_recoverd has had a chance to take up the previously queued start.  The
stop aborts the processing of the previous start by setting the
RECOVERY_STOP flag.  dlm_recoverd is erroneously clearing this flag and
ignoring the stop/abort if it happens to take up the start after the stop
meant to abort it.  The fix is to check the sequence number that's
incremented for each stop/start before clearing the flag.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:16 -05:00
David Teigland
91c0dc93a1 [DLM] fix aborted recovery during node removal
Red Hat BZ 211914

With the new cluster infrastructure, dlm recovery for a node removal can
be aborted and restarted for a node addition.  When this happens, the
restarted recovery isn't aware that it's doing recovery for the earlier
removal as well as the addition.  So, it then skips the recovery steps
only required when nodes are removed.  This can result in locks not being
purged for failed/removed nodes.  The fix is to check for removed nodes
for which recovery has not been completed at the start of a new recovery
sequence.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:13 -05:00
David Teigland
d4400156d4 [DLM] fix requestqueue race
Red Hat BZ 211914

There's a race between dlm_recoverd (1) enabling locking and (2) clearing
out the requestqueue, and dlm_recvd (1) checking if locking is enabled and
(2) adding a message to the requestqueue.  An order of recoverd(1),
recvd(1), recvd(2), recoverd(2) will result in a message being left on the
requestqueue.  The fix is to have dlm_recvd check if dlm_recoverd has
enabled locking after taking the mutex for the requestqueue and if it has
processing the message instead of queueing it.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:10 -05:00
David Teigland
435618b75b [DLM] status messages ping-pong between unmounted nodes
Red Hat BZ 213682

If two nodes leave the lockspace (while unmounting the fs in the case of
gfs) after one has sent a STATUS message to the other, STATUS/STATUS_REPLY
messages will then ping-pong between the nodes when neither of them can
find the lockspace in question any longer.  We kill this by not sending
another STATUS message when we get a STATUS_REPLY for an unknown
lockspace.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:06 -05:00
David Teigland
5206980964 [DLM] res_recover_locks_count not reset when recover_locks is aborted
Red Hat BZ 213684

If a node sends an lkb to the new master (RCOM_LOCK message) during
recovery and recovery is then aborted on both nodes before it gets a
reply, the res_recover_locks_count needs to be reset to 0 so that when the
subsequent recovery comes along and sends the lkb to the new master again
the assertion doesn't trigger that checks that counter is zero.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:03 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
fdda387f73 [DLM] Add support for tcp communications
The following patch adds a TCP based communications layer
to the DLM which is compile time selectable. The existing SCTP
layer gives the advantage of allowing multihoming, whereas
the TCP layer has been heavily tested in previous versions of
the DLM and is known to be robust and therefore can be used as
a baseline for performance testing.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:00 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
e2de7f5655 [DLM] fix oops in kref_put when removing a lockspace
Now that the lockspace struct is freed when the last sysfs object is released
this patch prevents use of that lockspace by sysfs. We attempt to re-get the
lockspace from the lockspace list and fail the request if it has been removed.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-06 09:28:01 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
ba542e3b92 [DLM] Fix kref_put oops
This patch fixes the recounting on the lockspace kobject. Previously the lockspace was freed while userspace could have had a
reference to one of its sysfs files, causing an oops in kref_put.

Now the lockspace kfree is moved into the kobject release() function

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-06 09:01:07 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
42fb00838a [DLM] fix iovec length in recvmsg
I didn't spot that the msg_iovlen was set to 2 if there
were two elements in the iovec but left at zero if not :(

I think this might be why bob was still seeing trouble.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-10-20 09:13:10 -04:00
Patrick Caulfield
4c5e1b1a8c [DLM] fix iovec length in recvmsg
The DLM always passes the iovec length as 1, this is wrong when the circular
buffer wraps round.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-10-12 17:11:33 -04:00
Adrian Bunk
1ee48af22e [DLM] Kconfig: don't show an empty DLM menu
Don't show an empty "Distributed Lock Manager" menu if IP_SCTP=n.

Reported by Dmytro Bagrii in kernel Bugzilla #7268.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-10-12 17:10:35 -04:00
Al Viro
38d6fd26ea [PATCH] dlm gfp_t annotations
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-09 14:19:08 -07:00
Theodore Ts'o
bba9dfd835 [GFS2] inode_diet: Replace inode.u.generic_ip with inode.i_private (gfs)
The following patches reduce the size of the VFS inode structure by 28 bytes
on a UP x86.  (It would be more on an x86_64 system).  This is a 10% reduction
in the inode size on a UP kernel that is configured in a production mode
(i.e., with no spinlock or other debugging functions enabled; if you want to
save memory taken up by in-core inodes, the first thing you should do is
disable the debugging options; they are responsible for a huge amount of bloat
in the VFS inode structure).

This patch:

The filesystem or device-specific pointer in the inode is inside a union,
which is pretty pointless given that all 30+ users of this field have been
using the void pointer.  Get rid of the union and rename it to i_private, with
a comment to explain who is allowed to use the void pointer.  This is just a
cleanup, but it allows us to reuse the union 'u' for something something where
the union will actually be used.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
2006-09-28 08:32:24 -04:00
Steven Whitehouse
907b9bceb4 [GFS2/DLM] Fix trailing whitespace
As per Andrew Morton's request, removed trailing whitespace.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-25 09:26:04 -04:00
David Teigland
fa9f0e4925 [DLM] confirm master for recovered waiting requests
Fixing the following scenario:
- A request is on the waiters list waiting for a reply from a remote node.
- The request is the first one on the resource, so first_lkid is set.
- The remote node fails causing recovery.
- During recovery the requesting node becomes master.
- The request is now processed locally instead of being a remote operation.
- At this point we need to call confirm_master() on the resource since
  we're certain we're now the master node.  This will clear first_lkid.
- We weren't calling confirm_master(), so first_lkid was not being cleared
  causing subsequent requests on that resource to get stuck.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-08 17:00:12 -04:00
David Teigland
a1d144c71d [DLM] use snprintf in sysfs show
Use snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, ...) instead of sprintf in sysfs show
methods.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-07 09:44:01 -04:00
David Teigland
c6e6f0ba8f [DLM] force removal of user lockspace
Check if the FORCEFREE flag has been provided from user space.  If so, set
the force option to dlm_release_lockspace() so that any remaining locks
will be freed.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-31 12:15:37 -04:00
David Teigland
5f88f1ea16 [DLM] add new lockspace to list ealier
When a new lockspace was being created, the recoverd thread was being
started for it before the lockspace was added to the global list of
lockspaces.  The new thread was looking up the lockspace in the global
list and sometimes not finding it due to the race with the original thread
adding it to the list.  We need to add the lockspace to the global list
before starting the thread instead of after, and if the new thread can't
find the lockspace for some reason, it should return an error.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-25 10:02:53 -04:00
David Teigland
233e515f40 [DLM] recover_locks not clearing NEW_MASTER flag
When there are no locks on a resource, the recover_locks() function fails
to clear the NEW_MASTER flag by going directly to out, missing the line
that clears the flag.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-24 09:38:19 -04:00
David Teigland
f5888750aa [DLM] sequence number missing in not_ready reply
When a status reply is sent for a lockspace that doesn't yet exist, the
message sequence number from the sender was not being copied into the
reply causing the sender to ignore the reply.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-24 09:37:43 -04:00
David Teigland
32f105a123 [DLM] down conversion clearing flags
The down-conversion optimization was resulting in the lkb flags being
cleared because the stub message reply had no flags value set.  Copy the
current flags into the stub message so they'll be copied back into the lkb
as part of processing the fake reply.  Also add an assertion to catch this
error more directly if it exists elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-23 16:07:31 -04:00
Patrick Caulfield
c059f70e35 [DLM] down conversion clearing flags
Oh, and here's (hopefully) the last of these ua_tmp patches. I think I've
caught all the paths now. Sorry it didn't make the last one.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-23 10:33:06 -04:00
Patrick Caulfield
10948eb4ed [DLM] preserve lksb address in user conversions
This patch fixes bz#203444 where the LKSB was lost during userland conversion
operations

Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-23 09:55:40 -04:00
David Teigland
a345da3e8f [DLM] dump rsb and locks on assert
Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of
dlm_print_rsb().  The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb
in addition to rsb details.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-21 09:50:09 -04:00
David Teigland
fcc8abc8d4 [DLM] move kmap to after spin_unlock
Doing the kmap() while holding the spinlock was causing recursive spinlock
problems.  It seems the kmap was scheduling, although there was no warning
as I'd expect.  Patrick, do we need locking around the kmap?

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-11 09:44:00 -04:00
David Teigland
4a99c3d9d6 [DLM] reject replies to old requests
When recoveries are aborted by other recoveries we can get replies to
status or names requests that we've given up on.  This can cause problems
if we're making another request and receive an old reply.  Add a sequence
number to status/names requests and reject replies that don't match.  A
field already exists for the seq number that's used in other message
types.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-09 17:32:07 -04:00
David Teigland
faa0f26772 [DLM] show nodeid for recovery message
To aid debugging, it's useful to be able to see what nodeid the dlm is
waiting on for a message reply.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-09 09:46:38 -04:00
David Teigland
06442440bc [DLM] break from snprintf loop
When the debug buffer has filled up, break from the loop and return the
correct number of bytes that have been written.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-09 09:46:04 -04:00
David Teigland
f6db1b8e72 [DLM] abort recovery more quickly
When we abort one recovery to do another, break out of the ping_members()
routine more quickly, and wake up the dlm_recoverd thread more quickly
instead of waiting for it to time out.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-09 09:45:31 -04:00
David Teigland
5ff519112a [DLM] print bad length in assertion
Print the violating name length in the assertion.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-09 09:44:54 -04:00
Patrick Caulfield
cc346d555f [DLM] fix userland unlock
This patch fixes the userland DLM unlock code so that it correctly returns the
address of the userland lock status block in its completion AST.

It fixes bug #201348

Patrick

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-08 10:34:40 -04:00
David Teigland
ae4a382004 [DLM] fix i_private
> I think you must have an old version of the base kernel as well?
> i_private no longer exists in struct inode, so you'll have to use
> something else,

I have that patch in my stack but didn't send it; for some reason I
thought it was already changed in your git tree.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26 15:31:15 -04:00
David Teigland
20abf975f7 [DLM] fix broken patches
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:47:14AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've applied all the patches you sent, but they don't build:

Argh, sorry about that... when I fixed these a long time ago they somehow
never got included in the quilt patches.  I mistakenly assumed the quilt
patches matched the source I had in front of me.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26 14:42:05 -04:00
David Teigland
81456807a3 [DLM] schedule during long loop through locks
The loop through all waiting locks in recover_waiters can potentially be
long, so we should schedule explicitly.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26 08:42:57 -04:00
David Teigland
2b4e926aab [DLM] fix loop in grant_after_purge
The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash
bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set.  The loop was quitting the
current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are
no more.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26 08:42:26 -04:00
David Teigland
f7da790d74 [DLM] set purged flag on rsbs
If a node becomes the new master of an rsb during recovery, the
LOCKS_PURGED flag needs to be set on it so that any waiting/converting
locks will try to be granted.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26 08:42:01 -04:00
David Teigland
5de6319b18 [DLM] more info through debugfs
Display more information from debugfs, particularly locks waiting for
a master lookup or operations waiting for a remote reply.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26 08:41:37 -04:00
David Teigland
3609819818 [DLM] fix whitespace damage
My previous dlm patch added trailing whitespace damage, fix that.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-21 01:55:41 -04:00
David Teigland
34e22bed19 [DLM] fix leaking user locks
User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were
never being removed from a process's list of locks.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-20 00:11:15 -04:00
Adrian Bunk
3b4a0a7494 [DLM] [RFC: -mm patch] fs/dlm/lock.c: unexport dlm_lvb_operations
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:48:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.18-rc1-mm1:
>...
>  git-gfs2.patch
>...
>  git trees.
>...

This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_lvb_operations).

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-20 00:09:09 -04:00