If an ARM system has multiple cpus in the same socket and the
kernel is booted with maxcpus=1, secondary cpus are possible but
not present due to how platform_smp_prepare_cpus() is called.
Since most typical ARM processors don't actually support physical
hotplug, initialize the present map to be equal to the possible
map in generic ARM SMP code. Also, always call
platform_smp_prepare_cpus() as long as max_cpus is non-zero (0
means no SMP) to allow platform code to do any SMP setup.
After applying this patch it's possible to boot an ARM system
with maxcpus=1 on the command line and then hotplug in secondary
cpus via sysfs. This is more in line with how x86 does things.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Rather than having each platform class provide a mach/smp.h header for
smp_cross_call(), arrange for them to register the function with the
core ARM SMP code instead.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
All platforms call trace_hardirqs_off() in their secondary startup code,
so move this into the core SMP code - it doesn't need to be in the
per-platform code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
There is a certain amount of smp_prepare_cpus() which doesn't belong
in the platform support code - that is, code which is invariant to the
SMP implementation. Move this code into arch/arm/kernel/smp.c, and
add a platform_ prefix to the original function.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Milo is an old boot loader, which is no longer relevant for these
platforms. References to it are misleading. Move the code out
of poke_milo(), and remove references to milo in comments.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
scu_get_core_count() never returns zero cores, so we don't need to
check and correct if ncores is zero.
Tegra was missing the check against NR_CPUS, leading to a potential
bitfield overflow if this becomes the case.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
We don't need to re-pass the base address for the CPU interfaces to the
GIC for secondary CPUs, as it will never be different from the boot CPU
- and even if it was, we'd overwrite the boot CPU's base address.
Get rid of this argument, and rename to gic_secondary_init().
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Stephen Boyd