Commit graph

17 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Ellerman
9f069af5b6 of: Drop properties with "/" in their name
Some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their name. This
causes problems when creating the /proc/device-tree file system,
because the slash is taken to indicate a directory.

We don't care about those properties, and we don't want to encourage
them, so just throw them away when creating /proc/device-tree.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Tested-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-06-13 18:12:24 -06:00
Tejun Heo
5a0e3ad6af include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
Jeremy Kerr
7c540d9e3d proc_devtree: fix THIS_MODULE without module.h
Commit e22f628395 introduced a build
breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we
don't have module.h

This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined.
While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a
tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we
ever do compile this as a module.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
2010-02-14 07:13:41 -07:00
Jeremy Kerr
50ab2fe147 proc_devtree: include linux/of.h
Currenly, proc_devtree.c depends on asm/prom.h to include linux/of.h, to
provide some device-tree definitions (eg, struct property).

Instead, include linux/of.h directly. We still need asm/prom.h for
HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-02-09 08:34:10 -07:00
Jeremy Kerr
8cfb3343f7 of: make set_node_proc_entry private to proc_devtree.c
We only need set_node_proc_entry in proc_devtree.c, so move it there.

This fixes the !HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS build, as we can't make make
the definition in linux/of.h conditional on this #define (definitions in
asm/prom.h can't be exposed to linux/of.h, due to the enforced #include
ordering).

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-02-09 08:34:10 -07:00
Alexey Dobriyan
e22f628395 Convert /proc/device-tree/ to seq_file
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-10-30 17:20:51 +11:00
Michal Simek
bcac2b1b7d procfs: remove sparse errors in proc_devtree.c
CHECK   fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:197:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:203:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:210:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:223:26: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:226:14: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-18 13:03:41 -07:00
Al Viro
3174c21b74 Move junk from proc_fs.h to fs/proc/internal.h
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11 21:36:01 -04:00
Anton Vorontsov
6b82b3e4b5 powerpc: Remove `have_of' global variable
The `have_of' variable is a relic from the arch/ppc time, it isn't
useful nowadays.

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2008-12-16 15:52:57 +11:00
Alexey Dobriyan
1e0edd3f67 proc: spread __init
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2008-10-23 13:32:31 +04:00
Stephen Rothwell
1a38147ed0 [POWERPC] Make struct property's value a void *
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2007-04-13 03:55:18 +10:00
Michael Ellerman
5149fa47ec [PATCH] powerpc: Cope with duplicate node & property names in /proc/device-tree
Various dodgy firmware might give us nodes and/or properties in the device
tree with conflicting names. That's generally ok, except for when we export
the device tree via /proc, so check when we're creating the proc device tree
and munge names accordingly.

Tested on a faked device tree with kexec, would be good if someone with
actual bogus firmware could try it, but just for completeness.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-03-28 16:45:23 +11:00
Steven Rostedt
64a07bd82e [PATCH] protect remove_proc_entry
It has been discovered that the remove_proc_entry has a race in the removing
of entries in the proc file system that are siblings.  There's no protection
around the traversing and removing of elements that belong in the same
subdirectory.

This subdirectory list is protected in other areas by the BKL.  So the BKL was
at first used to protect this area too, but unfortunately, remove_proc_entry
may be called with spinlocks held.  The BKL may schedule, so this was not a
solution.

The final solution was to add a new global spin lock to protect this list,
called proc_subdir_lock.  This lock now protects the list in
remove_proc_entry, and I also went around looking for other areas that this
list is modified and added this protection there too.  Care must be taken
since these locations call several functions that may also schedule.

Since I don't see any location that these functions that modify the
subdirectory list are called by interrupts, the irqsave/restore versions of
the spin lock was _not_ used.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-26 08:56:53 -08:00
Dave C Boutcher
898b5395e9 [PATCH] powerpc: Add/remove/update properties in /proc/device-tree
Add support to the proc_device_tree file for removing
and updating properties.  Remove just removes the
proc file, update changes the data pointer within
the proc file.  The remainder of the device-tree
changes occur elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Dave Boutcher <sleddog@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-01-13 21:02:13 +11:00
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
183d020258 [PATCH] ppc64: SMU partition recovery
This patch adds the ability to the SMU driver to recover missing
calibration partitions from the SMU chip itself. It also adds some
dynamic mecanism to /proc/device-tree so that new properties are visible
to userland.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-11-08 11:17:40 +11:00
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
5f64f73957 [PATCH] ppc32/ppc64: cleanup /proc/device-tree
This cleans up the /proc/device-tree representation of the Open Firmware
device-tree on ppc and ppc64.  It does the following things:

 - Workaround an issue in some Apple device-trees where a property may
   exist with the same name as a child node of the parent.  We now
   simply "drop" the property instead of creating duplicate entries in
   /proc with random result...

 - Do not try to chop off the "@0" at the end of a node name whose unit
   address is 0.  This is not useful, inconsistent, and the code was
   buggy and didn't always work anyway.

 - Do not create symlinks for the short name and unit address parts of a
   node.  These were never really used, bloated the memory footprint of
   the device-tree with useless struct proc_dir_entry and their matching
   dentry and inode cache bloat.

This results in smaller code, smaller memory footprint, and a more
accurate view of the tree presented to userland.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-01 07:54:14 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00