Here is small regression on dhrystone tests and I think
that on all benchmarking tests. It is due to better checking
mechanism in put_user macro
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
This is the first patch which does uaccess unification.
I choosed to do several patches to be able to use bisect
in future if any fault happens.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
This is first patch which clear part of uaccess.h.
uaccess.h will be clear later.
Signed-off-by: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
For 64bits arguments gcc caused that put_user macro
works with wrong value because of optimalization.
Adding volatile caused that gcc not optimized it.
It is possible to use (as Blackfin do) two put_user
macros with 32bits arguments but there is one more
instruction which is due to duplication zero return
value which is called put_user_asm macro.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
This function was actually causing harm, by hiding
errors about invalid sized get_user/put_user accesses.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
