Found one system that boot from socket1 instead of socket0, SRAT get rejected...
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 0 0-a0000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 0 100000-80000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 0 100000000-2080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 1 2080000000-4080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 2 PXM 2 4080000000-6080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 3 PXM 3 6080000000-8080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 4 PXM 4 8080000000-a080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 5 PXM 5 a080000000-c080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 6 PXM 6 c080000000-e080000000
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 7 PXM 7 e080000000-10080000000
...
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Allocated memnodemap from 500000 - 701040
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Using 20 for the hash shift.
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (0, 0x2080000, 0x4080000) 0 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (1, 0x0, 0x96) 1 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (1, 0x100, 0x7f750) 2 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (1, 0x100000, 0x2080000) 3 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (2, 0x4080000, 0x6080000) 4 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (3, 0x6080000, 0x8080000) 5 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (4, 0x8080000, 0xa080000) 6 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (5, 0xa080000, 0xc080000) 7 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (6, 0xc080000, 0xe080000) 8 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] Adding active range (7, 0xe080000, 0x10080000) 9 entries of 3200 used
[ 0.000000] SRAT: PXMs only cover 917504MB of your 1048566MB e820 RAM. Not used.
[ 0.000000] SRAT: SRAT not used.
the early_node_map is not sorted because node0 with non zero start come first.
so try to sort it right away after all regions are registered.
also fixs refression by 8716273c (x86: Export srat physical topology)
-v2: make it more solid to handle cross node case like node0 [0,4g), [8,12g) and node1 [4g, 8g), [12g, 16g)
-v3: update comments.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4B2579D2.3010201@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Some NUMA messages in srat_32.c are confusing to users,
because they seem to indicate errors, while in fact they
reflect normal behaviour.
Decrease the level of these messages to KERN_DEBUG so that
they don't show up unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
LKML-Reference: <200909050107.45175.rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so we don't get warning on 32bit system with 64g RAM or more
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Synchronized tables with current specifications.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
