Make sure the duty-cycle and period passed in are not negative. This
should eventually be made implicit by making them unsigned. While at
it, the drivers' .config() implementations can have the equivalent
checks removed.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Add resource managed variants of pwm_get() and pwm_put() for
convenience. Code is largely inspired by the equivalent devm functions
of the regulator framework.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Some hardware supports inverting the polarity of the PWM signal. This
commit adds support to the PWM framework to allow users of the PWM API
to configure the polarity. Note that in order to reduce complexity,
changing the polarity of a PWM signal is only allowed while the PWM is
disabled.
A practical example where this can prove useful is to simulate inversion
of the duty cycle. While inversion of polarity and duty cycle are not
exactly the same, the differences for most use-cases are negligible.
Signed-off-by: Philip, Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Fixes the following:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
WARNING: Prefer pr_warn(... to pr_warning(...
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/pwm/core.c:152:6: warning:
symbol 'of_pwmchip_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/pwm/core.c:165:6: warning:
symbol 'of_pwmchip_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Some versions of GCC don't seem no notice that the initialization of the
index variable is tied to that of the chip variable and falsely report
it as potentially being used uninitialized. However, to save anybody
else from tripping over this, we now initialize the index variable
unconditionally.
Originally-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
This patch adds helpers to support device tree bindings for the generic
PWM API. Device tree binding documentation for PWM controllers is also
provided.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
In order to get rid of the global namespace for PWM devices, this commit
provides an alternative method, similar to that of the regulator or
clock frameworks, for registering a static mapping for PWM devices. This
works by providing a table with a provider/consumer map in the board
setup code.
With the new pwm_get() and pwm_put() functions available, usage of
pwm_request() and pwm_free() becomes deprecated.
Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
This commit adds a debugfs interface that can be used to list the
current internal state of the PWM devices registered with the PWM
framework.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
This patch adds framework support for PWM (pulse width modulation) devices.
The is a barebone PWM API already in the kernel under include/linux/pwm.h,
but it does not allow for multiple drivers as each of them implements the
pwm_*() functions.
There are other PWM framework patches around from Bill Gatliff. Unlike
his framework this one does not change the existing API for PWMs so that
this framework can act as a drop in replacement for the existing API.
Why another framework?
Several people argue that there should not be another framework for PWMs
but they should be integrated into one of the existing frameworks like led
or hwmon. Unlike these frameworks the PWM framework is agnostic to the
purpose of the PWM. In fact, a PWM can drive a LED, but this makes the
LED framework a user of a PWM, like already done in leds-pwm.c. The gpio
framework also is not suitable for PWMs. Every gpio could be turned into
a PWM using timer based toggling, but on the other hand not every PWM hardware
device can be turned into a gpio due to the lack of hardware capabilities.
This patch does not try to improve the PWM API yet, this could be done in
subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@eia.be>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@kaehlcke.net>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
[thierry.reding@avionic-design.de: fixup typos, kerneldoc comments]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>